<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="en-us" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Houseknecht.NET</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.houseknecht.net/" />
  <link rel="self" href="http://www.houseknecht.net/SyndicationService.asmx/GetAtom" />
  <icon>favicon.ico</icon>
  <updated>2007-08-24T08:41:22.9508581-07:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Karl Houseknecht</name>
  </author>
  <subtitle>Music, musings and more...</subtitle>
  <id>http://www.houseknecht.net/</id>
  <generator uri="http://www.dasblog.net" version="1.9.6264.0">DasBlog</generator>
  <entry>
    <title>Line6 POD X3 First Look</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.houseknecht.net/Line6PODX3FirstLook.aspx" />
    <id>http://www.houseknecht.net/PermaLink,guid,b9402fef-f91f-4eda-81d4-722f61b01e1d.aspx</id>
    <published>2007-08-24T08:32:03.5481883-07:00</published>
    <updated>2007-08-24T08:32:03.5481883-07:00</updated>
    <category term="Guitar Effects" label="Guitar Effects" scheme="http://www.houseknecht.net/CategoryView,category,Guitar%2BEffects.aspx" />
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
          <strong>POD X3 and POD X3 Live ... First Look?</strong>
        </p>
        <p>
          <img height="345" alt="podx3" hspace="10" src="http://www.houseknecht.net/content/binary/podx3-2-20070824113205.jpg" width="420" align="left" vspace="10" />I
have to preface what I'm about to write with the fact that it is completely without
confirmation from Line6 at this time. However, it seems some of the information was
either intentionally leaked to some European distributors or they jumped the gun a
little early in putting it out on their website.
</p>
        <p>
I'm going to attempt to make sense of the <a href="http://line6.com/support/message.jspa?messageID=77359#77359" target="_blank">English
translation</a> of a German distributor's description of the new POD X3 and POD X3
Live. There's certainly a lot of room for interpretation. Babelfish does a notoriously
horrible job of it, making it sound like an English translation of a German translation
of a Japanese translation of the original Chinese text. Some of it was so comical
that when I first read it, I laughed until tears streamed down my face, causing the
people in adjacent cubes to believe that I had just been fired or had gone over the
edge.
</p>
        <p>
          <img height="235" alt="podx3live" hspace="10" src="http://www.houseknecht.net/content/binary/podx3live-1-20070824113218.jpg" width="420" align="right" vspace="10" />
        </p>
        <p>
I'm going to go through the description and attempt to <em>clarify</em> what I see
there. I will try to keep conjecture out of the writing as much as possible and stick
only to what is presented and what can be directly inferred from the writing. So let's
start by looking at the features listed in the article one at a time, focusing mostly
on what I judge to be the new features that set it apart from the XT and XT Live.
</p>
        <p>
          <strong>Inputs<br /></strong>The article states that there are two separate inputs on the X3: an instrument
input for guitar and bass, and an XLR input for a microphone. Both inputs can be used
at the same time and the signals can be routed to different effects/model chains.
This is very similar to the TonePort in which its multiple inputs can be split to
run separate model/effects chains. Nothing new here, just a repackaging of existing
technology, but with some interesting applications. Are you a solo act? Plug in your
guitar and mic to the X3 and run the outputs to your PA system. Now you have control
over your guitar amp models and vocal effects in one unit. It also gives you a single
unit to use for guitar, bass and vocals when used as a recording interface. No word
yet if there is onboard phantom power for using condenser mics.
</p>
        <p>
          <strong>Two Amps At Once</strong>
          <br />
Let's explore this feature because I want to explain what it is and what it isn't.
There appears to be multiple ways to use this feature:
</p>
        <ul>
          <li>
Separate amp models for each input. i.e. - one model for microphone and one for guitar/bass.</li>
          <li>
Two amp models simultaneously for a single input. i.e. - A guitar driving two different
amps, cabs and effects chains at the same time.</li>
          <li>
Morphing or blending between the two amp models using the expression pedal.</li>
        </ul>
        <p>
What this isn't is a Vetta II on the floor. The effects and amp chains are independent
of each other and don't appear to have the routing flexibility that the Vetta has
to offer. Again, think TonePort. Note that this was one of the most requested features
on the POD forum.
</p>
        <p>
          <strong>Stereo Effects Loop</strong>
          <br />
Now I consider this to be a potentially great new feature. I say potentially because
what we don't know at this time is whether the loop can be dynamically reassigned
an order within the effects chain. The picture of the X3 above shows the loop as coming
after the amp model, comp and eq, but before the mod, delay and reverb. Okay, that's
better than the loop on the XT Pro because I'd hesitate to call the "loop" in that
unit a loop at all. It's more like an insert between the processing of the XT and
the outputs. 
</p>
        <p>
The X3's loop appears to be in the middle of the signal chain. That implies that there
is an extra D/A A/D conversion on board to make it work. If this is true, it should
be a simple matter to make it routable. A static placement wouldn't make much sense.
My sense of this feature is that it was a response to the Variax users' request to
put in a loop for those using the VDI (Variax Digital Interface) so they could use
their stomp boxes with the XT Live. My potential use for it would be to include external
stomp effects after the internal stomp position, i.e. - running an X3 compressor stomp
before my external Bad Monkey or DS-1. We'll see. In either case, it appears to be
switchable so you can turn it on or off within a patch or between patches.
</p>
        <p>
If there was a second most requested feature on the POD forum, a routable effects
loop was probably it. Many people have wanted the flexibility that the <a href="http://www.rolandus.com/products/productdetails.aspx?ObjectId=720&amp;ParentId=46" target="_blank">Boss
GT-8</a> has in that regard. A routable effects loop would make it possible to use
the X3 Live using the 4CM (<a href="http://www.bossgtcentral.com/modules.php?name=FAQ&amp;myfaq=yes&amp;id_cat=3&amp;categories=Tips+and+Tricks#6" target="_blank">Four
Cable Method</a>) like the GT-8. That would be a kick-ass setup for live use if you
already have a great amp.
</p>
        <p>
          <strong>XLR Balanced Outputs<br /></strong>Finally! Did it make any sense to anyone else why the XT bean unit had balanced
outputs while the XT Live did not? Now I don't need to buy direct boxes if I want
to run to the PA.
</p>
        <p>
          <strong>S/PDIF Output<br /></strong>Again, great news. This was previously only available on the XT Pro. Now
you can get digital output without using USB which is going to be <em>very</em> good
news to the ProTools users who were out of luck with incompatibility issues between
ProTools and the XT USB drivers.
</p>
        <p>
          <strong>Models</strong>
        </p>
        <ul>
          <li>
78 guitar amp models. Same number as the XT with all model packs.</li>
          <li>
24 guitar cabinet models. Again, same as the XT.</li>
          <li>
98 pedal and studio effect models. Same</li>
          <li>
28 bass amp models. Same, with the bass expansion pack.</li>
          <li>
22 bass cab models. Same as above.</li>
          <li>
6 mic preamp models. Like the TonePort.</li>
          <li>
A.I.R. II cabinet/mic modeling. 4 mic models. Just like the XT.</li>
        </ul>
        <p>
I am inferring from the writing that the inclusion of the exact number of each type
of amp and effect model plus the inclusion of A.I.R. II means that we're getting XT
amp model technology and not "next generation". Not exactly new features, but the
apparent inclusion of all model packs and the ability to have the mic preamp models
seems like at least a new inclusion. 
</p>
        <p>
I am hopeful that the increased processing power is going to mean that Line6 can build
upon the next platform to eventually update the modeling algorithms. Again, we'll
see. One thing is certain, this will certainly put an end to the incessant whining
about "how come I have to buy all of these model packs?". 
</p>
        <p>
          <br />
        </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.houseknecht.net/aggbug.ashx?id=b9402fef-f91f-4eda-81d4-722f61b01e1d" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>O Holy Night</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.houseknecht.net/OHolyNight.aspx" />
    <id>http://www.houseknecht.net/PermaLink,guid,a6f25ecd-a15d-4b90-950a-e6d1f2b1a121.aspx</id>
    <published>2007-05-04T22:15:37.9941770-07:00</published>
    <updated>2007-05-04T22:15:37.9941770-07:00</updated>
    <category term="Songs" label="Songs" scheme="http://www.houseknecht.net/CategoryView,category,Songs.aspx" />
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
This is my absolute favorite Christmas song so I just had to do a guitar version of
it. I hope you get as much out of listening to it as I did out of playing it. Might
be the start of a tradition where I take one Christmas song per year and put my spin
on it. We'll see.
</p>
        <p>
          <a href="/songs/O%20Holy%20Night.mp3">O Holy Night, 160kbps mp3, 4.77MB</a>
        </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.houseknecht.net/aggbug.ashx?id=a6f25ecd-a15d-4b90-950a-e6d1f2b1a121" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Becoming Supernatural</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.houseknecht.net/BecomingSupernatural.aspx" />
    <id>http://www.houseknecht.net/PermaLink,guid,2e4c60a3-5450-4863-ba25-b7453ce8a012.aspx</id>
    <published>2007-05-04T22:12:05.2760000-07:00</published>
    <updated>2007-05-04T22:18:12.0869408-07:00</updated>
    <category term="Songs" label="Songs" scheme="http://www.houseknecht.net/CategoryView,category,Songs.aspx" />
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
Here's one that I wrote when I was inspired by the title of a novel that my boss was
writing. The singing might not be that good, but I really think the composition and
lyrics have something to them. I'll eventually get someone better than me to redo
the vocals.
</p>
        <p>
          <a href="/songs/Becoming%20Supernatural.mp3">Becoming Supernatural, 160kbps mp3, 4.89MB</a>
        </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.houseknecht.net/aggbug.ashx?id=2e4c60a3-5450-4863-ba25-b7453ce8a012" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Polish Sausage Blues</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.houseknecht.net/PolishSausageBlues.aspx" />
    <id>http://www.houseknecht.net/PermaLink,guid,3b0c29bb-57b1-4815-9016-e40405bc8139.aspx</id>
    <published>2007-05-04T22:08:49.1061689-07:00</published>
    <updated>2007-05-04T22:08:49.1061689-07:00</updated>
    <category term="Songs" label="Songs" scheme="http://www.houseknecht.net/CategoryView,category,Songs.aspx" />
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
This one was written on a bet with a carpool buddy (Ed) that I couldn't write a blues
song overnight. Blues is easy, Ed.
</p>
        <p>
PODxt patches for guitar and bass are now all mine. Drums are now NI Battery 2, multi-mic
Soul Kit sequenced in Sonar. There's even some keyboards way in the background.
</p>
        <p>
          <a href="http://www.houseknecht.net/songs/Polish%20Sausage%20Blues.mp3">Polish Sausage
Blues, 128kbps mp3, 2.15MB</a>
        </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.houseknecht.net/aggbug.ashx?id=3b0c29bb-57b1-4815-9016-e40405bc8139" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Birthday Jam</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.houseknecht.net/BirthdayJam.aspx" />
    <id>http://www.houseknecht.net/PermaLink,guid,616b348f-0819-4b87-8c83-edc5fc6150ac.aspx</id>
    <published>2007-05-04T22:00:50.2654835-07:00</published>
    <updated>2007-05-04T22:00:50.2654835-07:00</updated>
    <category term="Songs" label="Songs" scheme="http://www.houseknecht.net/CategoryView,category,Songs.aspx" />
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
This is a little take on Happy Birthday that I recorded for Kimmie on hers. See if
you can catch the Beatles reference.
</p>
        <p>
Same recording info as before, except started using some of my own patches for the
PODxt by this time.
</p>
        <p>
          <a href="/songs/Birthday%20Jam.mp3">Birthday Jam, 128kbps mp3, 1.05MB</a>
        </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.houseknecht.net/aggbug.ashx?id=616b348f-0819-4b87-8c83-edc5fc6150ac" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Wipeout</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.houseknecht.net/Wipeout.aspx" />
    <id>http://www.houseknecht.net/PermaLink,guid,108675fe-23bb-426f-b2de-5403757931a3.aspx</id>
    <published>2007-05-04T21:54:03.6587108-07:00</published>
    <updated>2007-05-04T21:54:03.6587108-07:00</updated>
    <category term="Songs" label="Songs" scheme="http://www.houseknecht.net/CategoryView,category,Songs.aspx" />
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
One of the first songs that I recorded when I set up my computer-based studio. Didn't
really know what I was doing with recording or with the PODxt. Drums are really mechanical
too. But hey, it's an updated, metalized version of the original that I'm told kicks
some serious butt. 
</p>
        <p>
Guitars are all PODxt using <a href="http://www.myspace.com/marauderus" target="_blank">Greg
Cosman's</a> patches (thanks, Greg!). Bass is also through the XT. Drums are the <a href="ftp://ftp.futurenet.co.uk/pub/computermusic/ns_kit/ns_kit7free-wav.zip" target="_blank">ns_kit7free</a> samples
sequenced through DrumSite.
</p>
        <p>
If you listen really closely to the beginning vocal, you can hear my daughters, Lauren
and Amber, joining in.
</p>
        <p>
          <a href="/songs/Wipeout.mp3">Wipeout, 128kpbs mp3, 3.09MB</a>
        </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.houseknecht.net/aggbug.ashx?id=108675fe-23bb-426f-b2de-5403757931a3" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>How to Make a Talk Box on the Cheap</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.houseknecht.net/HowToMakeATalkBoxOnTheCheap.aspx" />
    <id>http://www.houseknecht.net/PermaLink,guid,07325d6c-62cd-4d61-b13a-248a16b836b7.aspx</id>
    <published>2007-05-04T19:00:12.7723439-07:00</published>
    <updated>2007-05-04T19:00:12.7723439-07:00</updated>
    <category term="Guitar Effects" label="Guitar Effects" scheme="http://www.houseknecht.net/CategoryView,category,Guitar%2BEffects.aspx" />
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
So you've been really wanting to cover that Frampton/Walsh/Perry/Sambora/Slash tune
but you can't because you don't have a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talkbox" target="_blank">talk
box</a>. It's usually for one of two reasons:
</p>
        <ol>
          <li>
            <div>Traditional talk boxes are dangerous to hook up to your amp.
</div>
          </li>
          <li>
            <div>They cost money.
</div>
          </li>
        </ol>
        <p>
          <img height="198" alt="Dunlop Heil Talkbox" hspace="10" src="http://www.houseknecht.net/content/binary/talkbox-dunlopheil-20070504215945.jpg" width="225" align="left" vspace="10" />For
me, it was both. I wasn't about to go out and purchase a <a href="http://www.musiciansfriend.com/product/Dunlop-Heil-Talk-Box?sku=151230" target="_blank">Heil</a> unit
that requires you hook this up to the speaker output of your amplifier. One wrong
move or broken switch and there goes the power section of my <a href="http://www.atomicamps.com/products-212-50.html" target="_blank">Atomic
Reactor</a>. Also, these units go for as much as $150. To me, that's a lot of money
for an effect that will be used only on occasion.<img height="164" alt="Rocktron Banshee" hspace="10" src="http://www.houseknecht.net/content/binary/rocktronbanshee-20070504215954.jpg" width="90" align="right" vspace="10" /></p>
        <p>
Safer alternatives do exist. The <a href="http://www.musiciansfriend.com/product/Rocktron-Banshee-Talk-Box?sku=154218" target="_blank">Rocktron
Banshee</a> is an amplified unit that is safe to use because it doesn't require hooking
into your amp. Still pricy though, at $150, but it gets rave reviews. If you have
the money, this is the unit to buy. Danelectro sells an enticing little stomp called
the <a href="http://www.musiciansfriend.com/product/Danelectro-Free-Speech-Talk-Box?sku=151905" target="_blank">Free
Speech</a> for $100. It is completely self contained in that it contains its own mic
and gets amplified via your guitar amp. Nice <img height="121" alt="Danelectro Free Speech" hspace="10" src="http://www.houseknecht.net/content/binary/danelectrofreespeech-20070504215956.jpg" width="90" align="left" vspace="10" />idea,
but it is prone to feedback at stage volumes, requiring you to perform feats with
the tube and mic that are best left to Linda Lovelace. Besides, are you willing to
buy an effect from a manufacturer that insists on naming most products after food
items (Fish and Chips? How is that an EQ box?)
</p>
        <p>
So here was my dilemma. I had just spent a good deal of cash on a new guitar that
I needed. Now my band mates come to me asking to do a Bon Jovi song that requires
a talk box. Bon Jovi? How could I let them down?
</p>
        <p>
So I did a little research into talk boxes. What's inside? Surprisingly, not much.
The first talk boxes weren't commercial products. They were homemade, and many still
are. The <a href="http://www.blamepro.com/talkboxG.htm" target="_blank">traditional
design</a> calls for a length of tubing inserted into a compression horn driver. Put
this in a box, add a switch and speaker jack and you're pretty much set, as shown
in the diagram below. (Click to enlarge)
</p>
        <p align="center">
          <a href="http://www.houseknecht.net/content/binary/talkbox-diagram-1-20070504220006.jpg">
            <img height="128" alt="Typical Talk Box Diagram" hspace="10" src="http://www.houseknecht.net/content/binary/talkbox-diagram-1-small-20070504215958.jpg" width="225" vspace="10" />
          </a>
        </p>
        <p>
The components are pretty darn cheap. An <a href="http://www.partsexpress.com/pe/showdetl.cfm?&amp;Partnumber=260-097" target="_blank">80
watt compression horn driver</a> from Parts Express goes for $11. Vinyl tubing, switches
and jacks aren't that expensive either, let's say $15 for those. Add a box at maybe
another $10 and you have ~$35. However, this is for a talk box that connects to the
speaker output of your amp. If you wanted to build an amplified version like the Banshee
you'd have to include an amp and power supply. This adds more expense. Parts and shipping
for what I wanted to build added up to over $100. That's not much of a savings, and
I didn't have that kind of cash. So what now?
</p>
        <p>
I looked around my pile of old gear and found something interesting: a 20 year-old
mini amp named the Afterburner. It's got a 3" speaker and runs on a 9V battery and
it's in a sealed plastic case. And really, with a talk box, sound quality isn't an
issue. Hmm...
</p>
        <p>
          <img height="230" alt="Afterburner Mini Amp" hspace="10" src="http://www.houseknecht.net/content/binary/talkbox-afterburner-20070504215959.jpg" width="225" align="left" vspace="10" />
        </p>
        <p>
Self contained...powered...could be powered on my pedal board using a 9V battery adapter...small
enough. This was starting to look promising. Maybe I could take the speaker and guts
out and mount it in a small box? Nope. The speaker is glued to front of the grill.
So maybe I could figure out some way to use the amp as-is? How could I get the speaker
to force the air it is pushing out through a 1/2" plastic tube?
</p>
        <p>
          <a href="http://www.houseknecht.net/content/binary/talkbox-materials-20070504220007.jpg">
            <img height="168" alt="Talk box materials" hspace="10" src="http://www.houseknecht.net/content/binary/talkbox-materials-small-20070504220000.jpg" width="225" align="right" vspace="10" />
          </a>The
answer turned out to be simpler than I ever thought possible: a plastic funnel, some
epoxy gel, and silicone caulk. Add the vinyl tubing and we have everything we need
to make a talk box. (Click to enlarge) Note the <a href="http://www.musiciansfriend.com/product/DigiTech-Bad-Monkey-Tube-Overdrive-Pedal?sku=150831" target="_blank">Digitech
Bad Monkey</a> is there to provide some extra overdrive. The amp has its own and it
does work good enough, but I wanted to push it over the edge.
</p>
        <p>
So here's the list of materials you will need to make your own relatively cheap talkbox:
</p>
        <ul>
          <li>
            <div align="left">A mini amp. Something with a 2"-3" speaker is perfect. If you don't
have one, you can get one like this <a href="http://www.musiciansfriend.com/product/Dean-Markley-GT1000-Micro-Amp?sku=489004" target="_blank">Dean
Markley Micro Amp</a> for about $25.
</div>
          </li>
          <li>
            <div align="left">3"-4" plastic funnel. Don't worry if it doesn't fit exactly over
the speaker, just as long as it is as large or larger.
</div>
          </li>
          <li>
            <div align="left">Gel epoxy to glue the funnel onto the amp.
</div>
          </li>
          <li>
            <div align="left">Clear silicone caulking to seal the funnel.
</div>
          </li>
          <li>
            <div align="left">7' of clear vinyl tubing. 1/2" inner diameter, 5/8" outer diameter
is perfect.
</div>
          </li>
          <li>
            <div align="left">Optional - an overdrive or distortion pedal.
</div>
          </li>
          <li>
            <div align="left">Optional - a box, metal or wood, to house the product in for stage
use
</div>
          </li>
          <li>
            <div align="left">Optional - power and guitar jacks, switch, for stage use
</div>
          </li>
        </ul>
        <p>
And here are the very simple steps to create your own, cheap talk box:<a href="http://www.houseknecht.net/content/binary/talkbox-epoxiedfunnel-2-20070504220012.jpg"><img height="168" alt="Talkbox-EpoxiedFunnel" hspace="10" src="http://www.houseknecht.net/content/binary/talkbox-epoxiedfunnel-2-small-20070504220002.jpg" width="225" align="right" vspace="10" /></a></p>
        <ol>
          <li>
            <div align="left">Using a utility knife or hack saw, cut the plastic funnel at the
wide end so that it just fits over the speaker of the mini amp.
</div>
          </li>
          <li>
            <div align="left">Mix the epoxy and apply to the rim of the funnel.
</div>
          </li>
          <li>
            <div align="left">Affix the funnel to the mini amp making sure the rim entirely covers
the speaker.
</div>
          </li>
          <li>
            <div align="left">While epoxy sets for 5 minutes, cut the vinyl tubing to 7' with
a utility knife.
</div>
          </li>
          <li>
            <div align="left">Clean the mouth end of the tubing with Listerine mouthwash to kill
germs.
</div>
          </li>
          <li>
            <div align="left">Use the silicone caulking to seal around the outside edge of the
funnel.
</div>
          </li>
          <li>
            <div align="left">Attach the vinyl tube to the funnel and run the tube alongside a
mic stand. Use rubber bands to affix the tube to the side of the vocal mic, letting
about 1-1/2" extend beyond the mic.
</div>
          </li>
          <li>
            <div align="left">Plug in guitar, and optionally plug an overdrive stomp in front
of the amp.
</div>
          </li>
          <li>
            <div align="left">Put tube in mouth, crank up amp, and have a blast.
</div>
          </li>
          <li>
            <div align="left">Optionally, construct box to hold talkbox with guitar input/output,
switch and power jack.
</div>
          </li>
        </ol>
        <p>
          <a href="http://www.houseknecht.net/content/binary/talkbox-tubeattached-20070504220016.jpg">
            <img height="168" alt="Talkbox-TubeAttached" hspace="10" src="http://www.houseknecht.net/content/binary/talkbox-tubeattached-small-20070504220004.jpg" width="225" align="left" vspace="10" />
          </a>
        </p>
        <p>
Now, I'm no talkbox artist, but here are a couple of clips that illustrate both the
dry sound and an effected sound for recording. In both cases, I used a Shure SM57
as the vocal mic run into a <a href="http://www.line6.com/toneport/hardware.html" target="_blank">Line6
TonePort UX2</a>. Sounds good enough for both live and recorded use to me. Note: I
used a slightly larger vinyl tube and couldn't get the full range of sounds so I'm
going to replace it with the recommended size above.
</p>
        <ul>
          <li>
            <div align="left">
              <a href="http://www.houseknecht.net/songs/TalkboxTest.mp3">Dry talk
box sample</a>, SM57, TonePort UX2
</div>
          </li>
          <li>
            <div align="left">
              <a href="http://www.houseknecht.net/songs/TalkboxTest3.mp3">Effected
talk box sample</a>, SM57, TonePort UX2, chorus, reverb, delay
</div>
          </li>
        </ul>
        <p>
 
</p>
        <p>
Check back, as I will be updating this article as I prepare the talk box to be included
on my pedal board for gigging. Have fun building your own!
</p>
        <p>
Karl
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.houseknecht.net/aggbug.ashx?id=07325d6c-62cd-4d61-b13a-248a16b836b7" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Atomic Amps - Washington DC Demo</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.houseknecht.net/AtomicAmpsWashingtonDCDemo.aspx" />
    <id>http://www.houseknecht.net/PermaLink,guid,e88764c4-aef6-43cc-bfb6-75ed0f11ec9c.aspx</id>
    <published>2007-05-04T10:46:12.8855048-07:00</published>
    <updated>2007-05-04T10:46:12.8855048-07:00</updated>
    <category term="Atomic Amps" label="Atomic Amps" scheme="http://www.houseknecht.net/CategoryView,category,Atomic%2BAmps.aspx" />
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
In September of 2006 when <a href="http://www.atomicamps.com/" target="_blank">Atomic
Amps</a> released their new 50 watt versions of the Atomic Reactor, Tom King, President
of Atomic amps, scheduled a hands-on demo of the amps with me in Washington DC. Turnout
was a little light because we had to reschedule at the last minute, but the demo certainly
provided some very vocal and respected members of the Line6 PODxt community a chance
to see if this Atomic thing was really all it was cracked up to be. If you're looking
at the Atomic Reactor as your live amplification rig for the PODxt, read on...and
get out your credit card. You'll no doubt be purchasing one halfway through reading
this.
</p>
        <p>
          <img height="168" alt="The Red Room at Cue Recording Studios" hspace="10" src="http://www.houseknecht.net/content/binary/atomicdemo-theredroom-20070504134602.jpg" width="225" align="left" vspace="10" />The
demo took place at <a href="http://www.cuerecording.com/" target="_blank">Cue Recording
Studios'</a><a href="http://www.cuerecording.com/The%20Red%20Room.htm" target="_blank">Red
Room</a> in Falls Church, VA. It's a 30' x 30' room with a floor full of Persian rugs,
20' ceiling, small balcony, and a "drum-brella" which turned out to be a large patio
umbrella covered in Auralex and suspended from the ceiling using a pulley mechanism.
Really cool way of cutting down on drum reflections to just the right amount. Reminded
me of the "cone of silence". Tom was already there, set up and wailing away on the
212-50 when I came in. <a href="http://www.houseknecht.net/content/binary/atomicdemo-tom-2-20070504134614.jpg"><img height="168" alt="Tom King playing my Ibanez through the PODxt and 212-50" hspace="10" src="http://www.houseknecht.net/content/binary/atomicdemo-tom-2-small-20070504134611.jpg" width="225" align="right" vspace="10" /></a><a href="http://www.houseknecht.net/content/binary/atomicdemo-tom-1-20070504134615.jpg"></a></p>
        <p>
My initial impression of the 212-50 was "DANG! That's HUGE!". And indeed it is for
a 2x12 combo. It's 30" wide by 26" high and 13" deep while weighing in at 79 pounds.
Mine is now a bit taller as I installed 2-1/2" casters on it. Regardless, it looks
like a small 4x12 cab, and from what I heard Tom playing, it <em>sounded</em> like
one too. I was eager to give this thing a try and while I set up my PODxt, Tom took
a spin on my Ibanez SZ720, doing a little Van Halen medley. Not only can this dude
design amps, he can play too. No, make that <em>wail</em>. I wasted no time getting
my PODxt ready and plugging into the 212-50. Turned up the master on the Atomic to
full and the output volume on the XT to 3-1/2...
</p>
        <p>
          <a href="http://www.houseknecht.net/content/binary/atomicdemo-karl-20070504134617.jpg">
            <img height="168" alt="Me (Karl) giving the 212-50 a spin." hspace="10" src="http://www.houseknecht.net/content/binary/atomicdemo-karl-small-20070504134611.jpg" width="225" align="left" vspace="10" />
          </a>LOUD!
Really, freakin LOUD! But aside from the volume what I noticed most was that this
was the best option I'd tried yet for amplifying the PODxt. It's very faithful to
the character of the modeler, and yet it somehow improved upon it at the same time.
The amp sounded "real". The direct quality of the modeler was gone. The amps being
modeled not only sounded like the actual amps, but also responded like them too. They <em>felt</em> real.
Amps I'd never used before when going direct came to life through the Atomic. The
mid-gain Vox and Matchless sounds, crunch and shimmer, sounded and felt like the real
thing. The studio engineer, an admitted anti-POD guy, said that those mid-gain sounds
made him want to buy one of Tom's amps. High-gain amps became fire breathing beasts,
ready to disembowel you with thundering low end. Marshall Plexi models grunted and
barked like the real thing. Amazing! <a href="http://www.houseknecht.net/content/binary/atomicdemo-erik-20070504134619.jpg"><img height="168" alt="Erik Robelen playing the 11-50" hspace="10" src="http://www.houseknecht.net/content/binary/atomicdemo-erik-small-20070504134612.jpg" width="225" align="right" vspace="10" /></a></p>
        <p>
All right, plenty of talk about the 212...what about the 112-50? Can it deliver the
goods? Absolutely. In fact, aside from a slight advantage in the volume department
and maybe some extra low-end thump in favor of the 212, the 112-50 really is no different
except in size and trim. Very nice Voxy looking appointments on this baby, and easily
portable. Don't get the idea that just because it's a 112 combo that it can't be gigged
with. The studio engineer commented that it had to be easily the loudest 112 he's
ever heard. It rocks. And it's definitely giggable.
</p>
        <p>
          <a href="http://www.houseknecht.net/content/binary/atomicdemo-ts-808-20070504134620.jpg">
            <img height="168" alt="Erik's vintage TS-808" hspace="10" src="http://www.houseknecht.net/content/binary/atomicdemo-ts-808-small-20070504134613.jpg" width="225" align="left" vspace="10" />
          </a>Okay,
but what about stomp boxes? Lots of modeling amps don't play nice with those and if
you're like me, you still have a bunch of these lying around that you don't want to
part with. I brought out a stock <a href="http://www.musiciansfriend.com/product/Boss-DS1-Distortion-Pedal?sku=151258" target="_blank">Boss
DS-1</a> and put it in front of the PODxt using a clean Plexi patch. Engaged the stomp
and was right back in the 80's where I belong. Excellent! Another member of the crowd
brought out a original Ibanez TS-808 that we all drooled over. Plugged that in with
a Fender Deluxe dialed up and we were in blues territory. Did a little A/B of the
PODxt model of the 808 and found that it was very, very close. Okay, so the Atomic/PODxt
combo takes stomps exceptionally well. To date, I've used it with great success with
a <a href="http://www.musiciansfriend.com/product/DigiTech-Bad-Monkey-Tube-Overdrive-Pedal?sku=150831" target="_blank">Digitech
Bad Monkey</a>, a must-have stomp for $40. Amazing sound, buy two of them. Also does
really well with the <a href="http://www.musiciansfriend.com/product/Boss-MT2-Metal-Zone-Effects-Pedal?sku=151328" target="_blank">Boss
Metal Zone</a>. This is very important to the 80's hair metal folks like me. I know
it seems odd to some, but a distortion or overdrive stomp in front of a semi-clean
tube amp was <em>the</em> standard during the 80's. So was permed hair.<a href="http://www.houseknecht.net/content/binary/atomicdemo-tom2-20070504134621.jpg"><img height="168" alt="Tom demos the 112-50 with his LP Standard" hspace="10" src="http://www.houseknecht.net/content/binary/atomicdemo-tom2-small-20070504134613.jpg" width="225" align="right" vspace="10" /></a></p>
        <p>
So what about other options? Many of you may know that I really favored the Fender
Hot Rod series for working with the XT. They're great amps too, don't get me wrong,
but they don't hold a candle to the Atomic in this department. Just so I'd have a
fresh impression of the Hot Rod, I went to Guitar Center before the demo and plugged
into a DeVille 212. It sounded wonderful but after changing through the stock patches,
I started to notice something. All of the stock patches sounded wonderful, and they
also <em>all sounded the same</em>. Coincidently, this was a sound I really liked
which is why I must have been so keen on this combo, but what I realized is that the
Hot Rod DeVille made the PODxt sound like a PODxt through a Hot Rod DeVille. The characters
of the original amps were altered.
</p>
        <p>
Two things came out of this night:
</p>
        <ol>
          <li>
            <div>Tom King is an exceptional guy. He drove all the way from Connecticut to DC just
to show half a dozen guys his amps. I spoke with Tom bunches of times before and since
that time, both before and after my purchase, and he's just a class act. He really
cares about his product and more importantly, cares that you're happy with it. You
don't get customer service like this from Fender or Marshall.
</div>
          </li>
          <li>
            <div>These 50 watt Atomic amps are, pun intended, <em>da bomb</em>! I own one now:
a 212-50. It's the best amp I've ever owned and because of how it works with other
modeling units and preamps, probably one that I'll keep forever. How can you go wrong
with a 50 watt tube beast that makes everything you plug into it sound like gold?
</div>
          </li>
        </ol>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.houseknecht.net/aggbug.ashx?id=e88764c4-aef6-43cc-bfb6-75ed0f11ec9c" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Featured Articles</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.houseknecht.net/FeaturedArticles.aspx" />
    <id>http://www.houseknecht.net/PermaLink,guid,7007e436-3b2c-4c00-8e0f-47fa3cb53eda.aspx</id>
    <published>2007-05-03T13:58:40.9200000-07:00</published>
    <updated>2007-08-24T08:41:22.9508581-07:00</updated>
    <category term="Home" label="Home" scheme="http://www.houseknecht.net/CategoryView,category,Home.aspx" />
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
 
</p>
        <h3 align="left">
          <img height="199" alt="podx3" hspace="10" src="http://www.houseknecht.net/content/binary/podx3-5-20070824114026.jpg" width="240" align="left" vspace="10" />
          <a href="/Line6PODX3FirstLook.aspx">POD
X3, POD X3 Live...First Look?</a>
        </h3>
        <p>
My take on the hype around the hopefully forthcoming POD X3 and POD X3 Live before
it's official announcement and release.
</p>
        <p>
 
</p>
        <p>
 
</p>
        <p>
 
</p>
        <p>
 
</p>
        <p>
 
</p>
        <p>
 
</p>
        <p>
 
</p>
        <p>
 
</p>
        <hr />
        <img height="152" alt="Digitech Bad Monkey" hspace="10" src="http://www.houseknecht.net/content/binary/badmonkey-20070505002549.jpg" width="101" align="left" vspace="10" />
        <p>
 
</p>
        <h3 align="left">
          <a title="#" href="#">Spankin' the Monkey (Coming Soon)</a>
        </h3>
        <p>
Umm...Digitech Bad Monkey, that is. Karl gives a review of one of the most overlooked
overdrive stomps out there. Love it, touch it, pet my Monkey! Now ist der time on
Sprokets vere ve danz...
</p>
        <p>
 
</p>
        <br />
        <br />
        <br />
        <p>
 
</p>
        <hr />
        <p>
          <img height="136" alt="Talkbox-EpoxiedFunnel" hspace="10" src="http://www.houseknecht.net/content/binary/talkbox-epoxiedfunnel-1-20070504142038.jpg" width="164" align="left" vspace="10" />
        </p>
        <br />
        <h3>
          <a href="http://www.houseknecht.net/HowToMakeATalkBoxOnTheCheap.aspx">How to Make
a Talkbox on the Cheap</a>
        </h3>
        <p>
Karl satisfies his need for a cheap talkbox effect by using some items he already
had around the house, and surprises himself with the quality of the finished product.
Sound clips are here! Work in progress. Check back for updates on this project.
</p>
        <p>
 
</p>
        <p>
 
</p>
        <hr />
        <div align="left">
          <img height="133" alt="AtomicDemo-Tom2" hspace="10" src="http://www.houseknecht.net/content/binary/atomicdemo-tom2-1-20070504142039.jpg" width="178" align="left" vspace="10" />
          <br />
          <br />
          <h3>
            <a href="http://www.houseknecht.net/AtomicAmpsWashingtonDCDemo.aspx">Atomic Amps
- Washington DC Demo</a>
          </h3>
        </div>
        <div align="left">Read more about what happened when Tom King, President of Atomic
Amps, demoed his new line of 50 watt Atomic Reactor amplifiers to some members of
the Line6 PODxt community. A good review of these amps is detailed.
</div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.houseknecht.net/aggbug.ashx?id=7007e436-3b2c-4c00-8e0f-47fa3cb53eda" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>